<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for dysphemism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dysphemism.net/w/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dysphemism.net/w</link>
	<description>the substitution of a disagreeable, offensive, or disparaging expression for an agreeable or inoffensive one</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lamps, LEDs by Teague</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2012/02/08/lamps-leds/comment-page-1/#comment-32911</link>
		<dc:creator>Teague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=701#comment-32911</guid>
		<description>(I also thought about different hanging light fixtures I could make myself, but I realized that I would end up futzing with it forever, and my need for a new light fixture was acute.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I also thought about different hanging light fixtures I could make myself, but I realized that I would end up futzing with it forever, and my need for a new light fixture was acute.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lamps, LEDs by Teague</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2012/02/08/lamps-leds/comment-page-1/#comment-32910</link>
		<dc:creator>Teague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=701#comment-32910</guid>
		<description>Looks really nice!  When I replaced my lamp, I was also somewhat dubious that I would be able to complete the project successfully, but it really didn&#039;t even take that long in the end.

Re: the LED bulb, I&#039;m usually surprised how hot CFLs get.  I guess the takeaway is that incandescents waste an insane portion of their energy consumption on heat, so we can get much more efficient and still be generating a fair bit of heat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks really nice!  When I replaced my lamp, I was also somewhat dubious that I would be able to complete the project successfully, but it really didn&#8217;t even take that long in the end.</p>
<p>Re: the LED bulb, I&#8217;m usually surprised how hot CFLs get.  I guess the takeaway is that incandescents waste an insane portion of their energy consumption on heat, so we can get much more efficient and still be generating a fair bit of heat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lamps, LEDs by David Seelig</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2012/02/08/lamps-leds/comment-page-1/#comment-32818</link>
		<dc:creator>David Seelig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=701#comment-32818</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. I’d always learned that big reason incandescents are so inefficient is because they produce so much heat – I’m not sure if the issue is that the LEDs produce a lot of heat per se, or that it’s just that the LEDs don’t like heat and so they need to be protected from it, or that light really doesn’t take that much energy to produce, and so even with LEDs there’s a lot of heat generated! I’ll probably take a look at wikipedia later to figure it out…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. I’d always learned that big reason incandescents are so inefficient is because they produce so much heat – I’m not sure if the issue is that the LEDs produce a lot of heat per se, or that it’s just that the LEDs don’t like heat and so they need to be protected from it, or that light really doesn’t take that much energy to produce, and so even with LEDs there’s a lot of heat generated! I’ll probably take a look at wikipedia later to figure it out…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lamps, LEDs by lj</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2012/02/08/lamps-leds/comment-page-1/#comment-32799</link>
		<dc:creator>lj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=701#comment-32799</guid>
		<description>It is surprising that something that needs a heatsink could be so efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is surprising that something that needs a heatsink could be so efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lamps, LEDs by Another compulsive Norwegian</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2012/02/08/lamps-leds/comment-page-1/#comment-32789</link>
		<dc:creator>Another compulsive Norwegian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=701#comment-32789</guid>
		<description>It looks really nice.  It&#039;s an improvement.  And having a heat source in a room that&#039;s otherwise heated by an electric fan in the Pacific Northwest doesn&#039;t seem like such a bad thing!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks really nice.  It&#8217;s an improvement.  And having a heat source in a room that&#8217;s otherwise heated by an electric fan in the Pacific Northwest doesn&#8217;t seem like such a bad thing!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on some current questions by David Seelig</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2011/01/26/some-current-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-30206</link>
		<dc:creator>David Seelig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=640#comment-30206</guid>
		<description>@SS - Aha, so it isn&#039;t German after all! Perhaps the Germans only make good non-serrated knives?

@lj - I know what you mean about soft, squishy things. I have to confess that I&#039;m getting more and more anal about keeping my knives sharp, and I find if a non-serrated knife (there must be a term for a &#039;standard&#039; knife that doesn&#039;t use &#039;serrated&#039; in the definition?) is sharp enough, tomatoes, onions, and other challenges are no match. In a woodworking class at Carleton a visiting professor showed us how to sharpen a knife blade to the point where you could hold up a piece of paper with two fingers in one hand, and slice through it perpendicularly with your freshly sharpened blade. It was a pretty exciting moment.

@hannah - I&#039;m glad you were ranting about this too :) It&#039;s funny because I agree that the data can be useful (and fascinating) in certain circumstances. There are subtle observations that come out of this type of data. But in the context of starting a discussion about the speech as a whole I think it&#039;s such a silly tactic. It&#039;s up there with &quot;he had to wait for applause 23 times&quot; or &quot;he shook 37 members of congress&#039; hands&quot; ... &quot;what does that say about the speech as a whole?&quot;. Well, it depends on a lot of other factors!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SS &#8211; Aha, so it isn&#8217;t German after all! Perhaps the Germans only make good non-serrated knives?</p>
<p>@lj &#8211; I know what you mean about soft, squishy things. I have to confess that I&#8217;m getting more and more anal about keeping my knives sharp, and I find if a non-serrated knife (there must be a term for a &#8216;standard&#8217; knife that doesn&#8217;t use &#8216;serrated&#8217; in the definition?) is sharp enough, tomatoes, onions, and other challenges are no match. In a woodworking class at Carleton a visiting professor showed us how to sharpen a knife blade to the point where you could hold up a piece of paper with two fingers in one hand, and slice through it perpendicularly with your freshly sharpened blade. It was a pretty exciting moment.</p>
<p>@hannah &#8211; I&#8217;m glad you were ranting about this too :) It&#8217;s funny because I agree that the data can be useful (and fascinating) in certain circumstances. There are subtle observations that come out of this type of data. But in the context of starting a discussion about the speech as a whole I think it&#8217;s such a silly tactic. It&#8217;s up there with &#8220;he had to wait for applause 23 times&#8221; or &#8220;he shook 37 members of congress&#8217; hands&#8221; &#8230; &#8220;what does that say about the speech as a whole?&#8221;. Well, it depends on a lot of other factors!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on some current questions by SS</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2011/01/26/some-current-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-30189</link>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=640#comment-30189</guid>
		<description>Zanger-Icel, stainless steel, made in Portugal, a gift from your Aunt Karen.  Fantastic knife for which we are eternally grateful.
I leave world affairs to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zanger-Icel, stainless steel, made in Portugal, a gift from your Aunt Karen.  Fantastic knife for which we are eternally grateful.<br />
I leave world affairs to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on some current questions by hannah</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2011/01/26/some-current-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-30185</link>
		<dc:creator>hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=640#comment-30185</guid>
		<description>Ahh! I was just ranting about the counting words thing last night! I think that NPR and other media outlets have the idea that using Wordle and the like is this trendy hot thing to do, so they have to do it, because everyone wants to know these things, but I cannot think of a single useful reason to do this with any one particular work (speech, book, etc.). I don&#039;t know who started this, but they should be slapped. The thing is, smart people can recognize if a word is being used frequently in a speech. So pointing out that Obama consistently used the noun &quot;we&quot; instead of &quot;I&quot; or said &quot;together&quot; more often than usual could be sort of useful, as long as they were using those observations to make a larger point about what the word choice might mean. But knowing that he used a word 28 times is meaningless; it&#039;s an empty quantity without lots more context and comparison. Just because you can quantify something, it doesn&#039;t make it data. They&#039;re doing pseudo-science here.

The only time I can see word occurrences being useful is someone analyzing a book they themselves have written. Then I think it would be of personal interest, and potentially helpful in the editing process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh! I was just ranting about the counting words thing last night! I think that NPR and other media outlets have the idea that using Wordle and the like is this trendy hot thing to do, so they have to do it, because everyone wants to know these things, but I cannot think of a single useful reason to do this with any one particular work (speech, book, etc.). I don&#8217;t know who started this, but they should be slapped. The thing is, smart people can recognize if a word is being used frequently in a speech. So pointing out that Obama consistently used the noun &#8220;we&#8221; instead of &#8220;I&#8221; or said &#8220;together&#8221; more often than usual could be sort of useful, as long as they were using those observations to make a larger point about what the word choice might mean. But knowing that he used a word 28 times is meaningless; it&#8217;s an empty quantity without lots more context and comparison. Just because you can quantify something, it doesn&#8217;t make it data. They&#8217;re doing pseudo-science here.</p>
<p>The only time I can see word occurrences being useful is someone analyzing a book they themselves have written. Then I think it would be of personal interest, and potentially helpful in the editing process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on some current questions by lj</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2011/01/26/some-current-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-30184</link>
		<dc:creator>lj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=640#comment-30184</guid>
		<description>H was just saying the same thing about the word-counting last night. What I wonder is if speechwriters intentionally alter their word choice, knowing that people do this soft of analysis. The only time I&#039;ve thought it was at all interesting was once the NYT had a comparison of the most-used words in several speeches over time by different presidents--I think it might&#039;ve been the last several inaugural addresses. In comparison to one another they provided a concise snapshot of the nation&#039;s political mood at different points. But in isolation, just from one speech, I agree that it doesn&#039;t say much.

I disagree on the usefulness of serrated knives. I think they&#039;re good for bread and soft, squishy things like tomatoes. The one problem is that I don&#039;t know that you can easily sharpen them, so perhaps most serrated knives in the wild are dull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H was just saying the same thing about the word-counting last night. What I wonder is if speechwriters intentionally alter their word choice, knowing that people do this soft of analysis. The only time I&#8217;ve thought it was at all interesting was once the NYT had a comparison of the most-used words in several speeches over time by different presidents&#8211;I think it might&#8217;ve been the last several inaugural addresses. In comparison to one another they provided a concise snapshot of the nation&#8217;s political mood at different points. But in isolation, just from one speech, I agree that it doesn&#8217;t say much.</p>
<p>I disagree on the usefulness of serrated knives. I think they&#8217;re good for bread and soft, squishy things like tomatoes. The one problem is that I don&#8217;t know that you can easily sharpen them, so perhaps most serrated knives in the wild are dull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Anniversary Mom &amp; Dad by nlc</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2010/12/30/happy-anniversary-mom-dad/comment-page-1/#comment-30121</link>
		<dc:creator>nlc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/2010/12/30/happy-anniversary-mom-dad/#comment-30121</guid>
		<description>Fine looking couple.  And Happy Anniversary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine looking couple.  And Happy Anniversary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

