<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dysphemism.net/w/2010/03/01/usps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2010/03/01/usps/</link>
	<description>the substitution of a disagreeable, offensive, or disparaging expression for an agreeable or inoffensive one</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SS</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2010/03/01/usps/comment-page-1/#comment-28705</link>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=473#comment-28705</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, really unfortunately, my impression is that junk mail is what is keeping the postal service afloat, so to speak.  It costs the P.O. much less to deliver than real mail.  I would love to ban it entirely, but then we&#039;d probably have to pay a lot more for letters and packages.  But wouldn&#039;t it be great to get only mail from people or companies we really want or need to hear from!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, really unfortunately, my impression is that junk mail is what is keeping the postal service afloat, so to speak.  It costs the P.O. much less to deliver than real mail.  I would love to ban it entirely, but then we&#8217;d probably have to pay a lot more for letters and packages.  But wouldn&#8217;t it be great to get only mail from people or companies we really want or need to hear from!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teague</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2010/03/01/usps/comment-page-1/#comment-28680</link>
		<dc:creator>Teague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=473#comment-28680</guid>
		<description>That statistic about Americans receiving 55% of the world&#039;s total mail volume is amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That statistic about Americans receiving 55% of the world&#8217;s total mail volume is amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lj</title>
		<link>http://dysphemism.net/w/2010/03/01/usps/comment-page-1/#comment-28667</link>
		<dc:creator>lj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dysphemism.net/w/?p=473#comment-28667</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to know what percentage of US mail is junk mail. A large percentage of my mail is junk mail that&#039;s not even addressed to me. (Or real mail that&#039;s not addressed to me: perhaps the postal service is going broke because they can&#039;t tell the difference between &quot;Tenth&quot; and &quot;Zenith,&quot; or &quot;6&quot; and &quot;2.&quot;)

More seriously, I think one thing holding up a conversion to 100% electronic is the lack of a universally accepted and supported method of *secure* electronic communication--something like encrypted email--along with digital signatures. Once, or if, public-key crypto gets built into the intertoobs, mail really will be dead for everything except packages, postcards, and hardcopy spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know what percentage of US mail is junk mail. A large percentage of my mail is junk mail that&#8217;s not even addressed to me. (Or real mail that&#8217;s not addressed to me: perhaps the postal service is going broke because they can&#8217;t tell the difference between &#8220;Tenth&#8221; and &#8220;Zenith,&#8221; or &#8220;6&#8243; and &#8220;2.&#8221;)</p>
<p>More seriously, I think one thing holding up a conversion to 100% electronic is the lack of a universally accepted and supported method of *secure* electronic communication&#8211;something like encrypted email&#8211;along with digital signatures. Once, or if, public-key crypto gets built into the intertoobs, mail really will be dead for everything except packages, postcards, and hardcopy spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

